Legal Opinion

Holden v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided August 30, 2006No. 10-05-00242-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELIPE REYNA, Justice.

This case involves possession of a controlled substance. In two points, Appellant contends that the trial court erred by failing to suppress: (1) evidence seized without a search warrant; and (2) contents of a box discovered after the initial search. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Responding to a domestic disturbance call, Officer Mario Cantu, Jr. observed Kenneth Holden and Kandy Greenwood arguing. Cantu separated the parties and first spoke with Holden who said that a verbal disagreement, and no physical violence, had taken place. As evidenced by two packing containers…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Marquis Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API