Holden v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
This case involves possession of a controlled substance. In two points, Appellant contends that the trial court erred by failing to suppress: (1) evidence seized without a search warrant; and (2) contents of a box discovered after the initial search. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Responding to a domestic disturbance call, Officer Mario Cantu, Jr. observed Kenneth Holden and Kandy Greenwood arguing. Cantu separated the parties and first spoke with Holden who said that a verbal disagreement, and no physical violence, had taken place. As evidenced by two packing containers…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Marquis Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007