People v. Daniels
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW
Defendant, Eric D. Daniels, appeals from his conviction and death penalty sentence, contending that he was denied a fair trial because he was allowed only seven peremptory challenges to prospective jurors instead of the 14 specified for capital cases under Supreme Court Rule 434(d) (134 Ill. 2d R. 434(d)). Defendant also argues that the trial court compounded its error by refusing to excuse for cause a prospective juror who knew and had experience with the lead prosecutor in defendant’s trial. The same prosecutor helped to obtain the conviction of a person accused of sexually assaulting that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- People v. PeeplesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- People v. GlasperIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. DanielsIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. M.D.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. JamisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. PikesIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.