Legal Opinion
Francosteel Corp. v. M v. Pal Marinos
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 27, 1995No. 94 Civ. 1992 (RLC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Defendant Pal Marinos Marine Co. (“Pal Marinos”) moves for an order pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., granting partial summary judgment limiting the liability of Pal Marinos to $500 per package pursuant to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”), 46 U.S.CApp. §§ 1300-1315 (1988). Plaintiff Francosteel Corporation (“Francosteel”) cross-moves for an order pursuant to Rule 12(f), F.R.Civ.P., and/or Rule 56(a), F.R.Civ. P., granting partial summary judgment striking Pal Marinos’ second affirmative defense insofar as it alleges a $500 per package limitation of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/v Peisander, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Mitsui & Co., Ltd. And Ataka & Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. American Export Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Armstrong Cork Canada, Ltd., and Armstrong Cork Company v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Schiess-Froriep Corp. v. FinnsailorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Daval Steel Products v. M/V ACADIA FORESTDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Royal Insurance v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- The Nippon Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. M v. Tourcoing, Wilhelmsen Lines A.S., and Maher Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Nippon Fire & Marine Insurance v. M.V. TourcoingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Royal Ins Co v. Orient OverseasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.