Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sahli v. Woodbine Board of Education

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 30, 2008Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Albin

School board attorneys will be surprised to learn from today’s majority opinion that they do not hold a “position” in local government. As a result of that crabbed interpretation of N.J.S.A 18A:16-6, when a lawsuit — however frivolous — is filed against the members of a school board, its administrators, and its solicitor arising from the performance of their duties, the school board will indemnify everyone but its appointed attorney. Because that interpretation is at odds with the plain and commonsense meaning of the statutory text, I respectfully dissent.

Plaintiff Ronald W. Sahli, Esq., was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Medical Society v. New Jersey Department of Law & Public SafetySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. Gilborges v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Fredericks v. Board of HealthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  4. Green v. Auerbach Chevrolet Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. Gilborges v. WallaceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API