Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Devon G.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 26, 1999No. 1 CA-JV 98-0109Published

1ConcurrenceLankford, Judge

¶ 13 I concur in the result. My reasons for reversal differ from those stated in the lead opinion.

¶ 14 In my view, we need only follow our prior decision in In re Alton D., 193 Ariz. 98, 970 P.2d 452 (App.1998). Although Alton D. noted that it involved a plea agreement and an agreed restitution cap, those facts are not indispensable. Instead, I agree with the essential underpinning of that opinion, which consists of two propositions: (1) The court may impose deadlines on restitution claims; and (2) The court may also modify a restitution order as an exercise of its power to change the terms…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Alton D.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API