Rita Kendzierski v. County of MacOmb
Michigan Supreme Court
1Dissent
McCormack, C.J. (dissenting).
The majority holds that the defendant, Macomb County (the County), is entitled to summary disposition because the County's contractual promise to provide retiree healthcare benefits does not extend beyond the duration of the County's collective-bargaining agreements (CBAs) with its employee unions. It reasons that the general durational clauses in the CBAs *621unambiguously govern that promise because the agreements neither include language exempting retiree healthcare benefits from that general period nor explicitly promise healthcare benefits for the retirees'…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.