Legal Opinion
Haro v. Walmart Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 10, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00239Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMADO HARO and ROCHELLE No. 1:21-cv-00239-KES-SKO ORTEGA, On Behalf of Themselves and 12 All Others Similarly Situated, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 13 Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 14 v. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND 15 WALMART, INC., COSTS AND FOR APPROVAL OF SERVICE AWARD AND INDIVIDUAL 16 Defendant. SETTLEMENT 17 (Docs. 143, 149) 18 19 Pending before the Court is an unopposed motion for final approval of a class action 20 settlement and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.