State v. Doyle

¶ 1 Appellant Brian Doyle (Doyle) appeals from his conviction for felony theft (common scheme) in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County. We affirm.

¶2 Doyle raised three issues on appeal; however, in his reply brief, he abandoned two of the issues, leaving the following issue as dispositive:

¶3 Did the State establish that Doyle had deprived the owner of the property in question in violation of § 45-6-301(2), MCA?

¶4 Doyle worked for Hamid Basirat (Basirat) as a vacuum cleaner sales representative for the Electrolux Corporation. Electrolux had a policy that if a sales representative…