Legal Opinion

Casey v. Massachusetts Electric Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 23, 1984PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The plaintiff, William J. Casey, sought a judgment declaring that, pursuant to G. L. c. 166, § 39, 1 the defend ant, Massachusetts Electric Company (company), is obliged to assume certain costs, including the cost of temporary removal of its poles, to permit the plaintiff to relocate his home within the city of Lynn. G. L. c. 231A, § 2. A judge of the Superior Court reported four questions to the Appeals Court on a statement of agreed facts. See G. L. c. 231, § 111, third par.; Mass. R. Civ. P. 64, 365 Mass. 831 (1974). We transferred this case to this court on our own motion. We conclude…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Key Capital Corp. v. M&S LIQUIDATING CORP.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  2. Columbia Chiropractic Group, Inc. v. Trust InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Collatos v. Boston Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 3844 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. Weitzel v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API