Legal Opinion

Luxottica Group S.P.A. v. United States Shoe Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 22, 1995No. C2-95-244Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GRAHAM, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiff Avant-Garde Optics, Inc. (“Avant-Garde”) for a hearing and an order requiring the defendant United States Shoe Corporation (“U.S. Shoe”) to show cause why an order should not be entered directing it to provide shareholder records.

Avant-Garde is a subsidiary corporation of Luxottica Group S.p.A. and a record shareholder of U.S. Shoe. On March 7, 1995, Avant-Garde delivered a written demand to U.S. Shoe to inspect and copy shareholder records. On March 10, 1995, U.S. Shoe responded by refusing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William P. Sadler, Barbara K. Sadler, and American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Ncr CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Cenergy Corp. v. Bryson Oil & Gas P.L.C.District Court, D. Nevada · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API