Legal Opinion

Tracton v. A & O Novelties Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Mabkoavitz, J.

Plaintiff sues upon a cause of action for goods sold and dehvered, to recover a balance due of $5,741.42. Defendant manufacturers artificial Christmas trees, Avhich are placed in pots supplied to it by the plaintiff’s assignor. The defendant claims that to some extent the materials delivered to defendant were defective and required further working by it, and consequently in the original answer it set forth a counterclaim representing the cost to it of putting the pots in shape.

On plaintiff’s motion for partial judgment, he deducts the amount in suit under the counterclaim, in the sum of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Gotham Silver Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  2. A. O. Andersen Trading Co. v. BrodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ebasco Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Harbor Hill Lithographing Corp. v. Dittler Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. National Farmers Organization, Inc. v. McCook Feed & Supply Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Belmet Products, Inc. v. Merit Enterprises, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  5. National Farmers Organization, Inc. v. McCook Feed & Supply Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API