Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Burton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 15, 1838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

cited: 3 East’s R. 257-8-9; 2 Tuc. Com. 137-8; 7 Cranch, 303-4; Coke’s R. 3 vol. p. 45-6; 1 Burr. R. 9; 1 Mo. D. 617; Bac. Ab. t. Obligation, a. vol. 5, p. 155. cited: 3 East, 278-9; 3 Bl. Com. 16; 2 John. R. 342; 2 Star. 25; 5 East, 294; 2 Tuc. 27-8; 2 John. Dig. p. 4; 1 Saund. PI. p, 26; 1 Chit. 93; 6 T. R. 176-7.

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, Judge

Burton sued Shaw by y etition in debt on a promissory note. Shaw appeared and filed two pleas, the first, in substance as follows: That after the day of the date of the said writing of the defendant in plaintiff’s petition, mentioned, to wit, on the 19th day of September, A. D. 1837, at the county of Marion, and State of Missouri, *479the said defendant did, at the special instance and je-cjuest of the plaintiff, mate and execute to the plaintiff his certain deed in writing, to wit, on the day and year last' aforesaid, signed with the hand and sealed with the seal of said defendant, which said…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freiermuth v. McKeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Oil Well Supply Co. v. WolfeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Wilkerson v. BruceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API