Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Interest of L.M. v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1992No. 89-CA-0212Published

1DissentBanks, Justice

Our concealed weapons statute is directed at weapons which are readily accessible to the person charged with “carrying” them. Clark v. City of Jackson, 155 Miss. 668, 124 So. 807 (1929). Here the weapons in question were under the hood of an automobile. Clearly, they were not accessible within the meaning of our law. While we have no cases on point, other courts have made the common sense finding that a weapon under a hood is not readily accessible. People v. Cook, 46 Ill.App.3d 511, 5 Ill.Dec. 81, 361 N.E.2d 81 (1977). The majority agrees and distinguishes cases where the weapons were found…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Clark v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API