Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank A. Stephenson, Michael L. Tate, and Donnell M. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 8, 1995No. 94-2435, 94-2436 and 94-2437PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORGLE, District Judge.
This is the consolidated appeal of three defendants, all of whom were convicted of various offenses arising out of a conspiracy to distribute cocaine in Springfield, Illinois. Defendants challenge their convictions and sentences on several grounds. We affirm the district court in all respects.
I
Defendants Donnell M. Hill (“Hill”), Michael L. Tate (“Tate”), and Frank A. Stephenson (“Stephenson”) were charged in a five count indictment. Count I charged that Defendants conspired with each other and Harrison Richard King (“King”) to distribute cocaine in violation of 21…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Mason Townsend, Luis E. Diaz, Orlando Nunez, Dorothy Taylor, Carlos Mejia, Joseph Angel Claudio, and Isabel MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Steven C. Griffin, Marvin M. Rux, and Andrae ScurlockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Tony SparkmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. CeballosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Joseph PolichemiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Eliseo ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.