Legal Opinion

Rousseau v. Diemer

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 22, 1998No. Civil Action 97-40075-CBSPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SWARTWOOD, United States Magistrate Judge.

Nature of the Case

George F. Rousseau (“Plaintiff’ or “Mr. Rousseau”) has filed an Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) seeking damages for work performed as a subcontractor on a parcel of land located in Westborough, Massachusetts (the “Property”) which was owned by Route 9 Associates Limited Partnership (“Route 9 Associates”), a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership, authorized to do business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Plaintiff seeks to recover from George Diemer (“Mr.Diemer”) and Robert C. Pacilli (“Mr.Pacilli”), individually…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Choate, Hall & Stewart v. SCA Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. International Mobiles Corp. v. Corroon & Black/Fairfield & Ellis, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  4. Saenger Organization, Inc. v. Nationwide Insurance Licensing Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Pagliuca v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Miller v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Miller v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  4. Sprague v. Sysco Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. Morrison Informatics, Inc. v. Members 1st Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API