Legal Opinion

Van Orden v. Simpson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, fifth district, entered after a trial by the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPendleton, J.

The action is for broker’s commission in obtaining a loan. The defense is a denial. At the trial plaintiff testified to the employment, and any question as to plaintiff’s having been employed to secure a loan is, I think, settled by defendant’s letter of January fourth, which distinctly speaks of a loan. The substantial question involved is whether the commission was earned. It fairly appears from the evidence that plaintiff procured a lender able and willing to make the loan and so notified the defendant, and by agreement the closing was fixed for Saturday, no hour *323being named; the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Page v. . ShainwaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lehigh Valley R. v. John Lysaght, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. Andes Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Meier v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1951
  4. Blake v. PerrinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. Lingquist v. LobleMontana Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API