Legal Opinion

Parella v. Montalbano

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 9, 2006No. 2003-595-AppealPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG,

for the Court.

This appeal requires the Supreme Court to pass upon the constitutionality of G.L. 1956 § 22-1-2, the Senate redistricting statute, to decide whether the enactment violates the Compactness Clause of the Rhode Island Constitution. 1 The facts of this case are largely undisputed and concern events that are unique and unprecedented in Rhode Island history. In November 1994, a majority of the electorate voting in a statewide election adopted amendments to articles 7 and 8 of the Rhode Island Constitution that, commencing in January 2003, eliminated…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
  3. Wilson v. KasichOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re Jermaine H.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  5. Maglioli v. J.P. Noonan Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API