Legal Opinion
Burkenroad-Goldsmith Co. v. Elliott
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1909No. 4658Published
Appeal from Civil District Court, Division “E.”
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
George Elliot petitioned for and obtained a respite. One of his creditors, plaintiff company, to which he was indebted in the sum of $227.84, and which had not assented to *202the respite, ruled Elliot to show cause why he should not furnish security for mover’s claim, “conditioned according to law,” and upon the same being so ordered the following bond was executed :
No. 80508, Division “D.”
Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans.
GEORGE ELLIOT VS. HIS CREDITORS.
“In accordance with the order of this Honorable Court under date of February 26th, 1907, T shall be surety to Messrs.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Slocomb v. RobertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
- White v. Inhabitants of LevantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
- Barrow v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1837
- Town of Clinton v. BuellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887