Legal Opinion

United States v. Baxt

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 26, 1999No. Criminal 99-75Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORLOFSKY, District Judge.

This case presents the vexatious and troublesome question of when and under what circumstances an indictment must be dismissed for “preindictment delay.” On February 19, 1999, Defendant, Paul Baxt (“Baxt”), was indicted for misrepresenting his financial assets on loan applications submitted to Summit Trust Company (“Summit Trust”) in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 and 2. 1 See Indictment (filed Feb. 19, 1999). The last of the activities for which Baxt was indicted occurred in May, 1989, nearly ten years before the indictment was finally obtained on February 19,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Franklin Evon Sebetich A/K/A Frank, Earl Dean, Jr., A/K/A Dooney, Michael John BuhoveckyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. A. Guy Crouch, III and Michael J. FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API