Legal Opinion

First National Bank's Receiver v. Boreing's Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 19, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Laurel Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

The First National Bank of London, Kentucky, brought suit against J. M. Boreing’s administratrix to recover on several notes and for a settlement of his estate. Some time thereafter the bank was closed by an order of the comptroller of the currency and placed in the hands of Fred W. Weitzel, receiver, for the purpose of winding up its affairs. About eleven months after his appointment, the receiver presented as a claim against J. M. Boreing’s estate a note for $3,260.00, dated November 13th, 1911, and executed by J. M. Boreing…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heath v. Turner, Special Deputy Banking, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Whitesboro Nat. Bank v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API