Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Elliott v. Reasbeck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 28, 1979No. 79-142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter has been considered on a suggestion for writ of prohibition. Defendant’s motion to discharge under the Speedy Trial Rule, Rule 3.191, Fla.R.Crim.P., was denied. An order to show cause was issued and the positions of the various parties have been considered. It is our conclusion that in accordance with State v. Kurtz, 354 So.2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), the defendant herein waived his right to rely upon strict time limitations provided in Rule 3.191.

Defendant herein requested a continuance and the defendant now directs our attention to a transcript of a colloquy between counsel when…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KurtzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RegisterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. State v. McCreryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API