Legal Opinion

Valente v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 1998No. 97-592PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Todd Valente appeals convictions for workers compensation fraud, grand theft and perjury, alleging that the trial court erred by excluding evidence of a history of litigation between a witness who testified against the appellant and the appellant’s father. He also alleges that the court erred by imposing the condition of probation that requires him to work diligently at a lawful occupation without considering the possibility that economic conditions could frustrate his attempt.

The record reflects that a question during cross-examination was posed by defense counsel as to whether litigation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Finney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. A. McD. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Gregory v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Reiter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Ketrow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gary v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Catherine Capozzi v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API