Legal Opinion

Yates v. Helstern

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1940Published

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The cause of action appearing from the pleadings is to recover for the county money now in the hands of the defendant Helstern. The question to1 be decided on this appeal is whether an action can be maintained at the behest of a taxpayer without authorization by the county board of supervisors for and on behalf of the county, against one who claims tO' have the right to certain moneys in his possession where the county board is so constituted that demand on it for action would be futile.

This action was begun June 14, 1939. There were no formal proceedings on any resolution referring directly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Trust Co. v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Reetz v. KitchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Schulz v. KisslingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API