Legal Opinion

Dudic Holding Corp. v. Feinstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 10, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The installation and maintenance by the tenant of an air conditioning unit projecting beyond the building wall is an intrusion or squatting upon the landlord’s property within *43the purview of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act (Joan Bldg. Corp. v. Gould, 276 App. Div. 765; Tuchfeld v. Annenberg, N. Y. L. J. May 18, 1951, p. 1849, col. 5; Thatford Stone Corp. v. Sassano, N. Y. L. J., June 27, 1952, p. 2521, col. 2; Goldstein v. Alweiss, 196 Misc. 513; Prestipino v. Matarazzo, 99 N. Y. S. 2d 606; Kaplan v. Sessler, 197 Misc. 270). Insofar as Taft Constr. Corp. v. Bachnoff (107 N. Y. S. 2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. AlweissAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949
  2. Kaplan v. SesslerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Victory Holding Corp. v. HermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API