Legal Opinion
In re Behr Dayton Thermal Products, LLC
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 28, 2014No. 3:08-cv-326PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING OLD CARCO’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. 203)
MICHAEL J. NEWMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Now before the Court is Nominal Defendant Old Careo LLC’s Motion for a Protective Order (doc. 203) and memorandum in support (doc. 204), Plaintiffs’ memorandum in opposition (doc. 206), Old Carco’s reply (doc. 207), and Plaintiffs’ surreply, filed with leave of Court (doc. 208). Old Careo seeks a Protective Order to prevent disclosure of fifty-eight documents on the basis that they are privileged under the attorney-client privilege and/or as attorney work product. The Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- In Re Chrysler LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- In Re Old Carco LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Chrysler LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gibbs v. Stinson DOCKET IN THIS CASE ONLYDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
- In re Lifetrade LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023