Legal Opinion

People v. Warner

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1960No. Crim. No. 3725Published

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary in the second degree. The only contentions on appeal are that (1) the district attorney at the trial committed prejudicial misconduct in commenting on a question asked of the defendant by his own counsel; (2) the trial court erroneously admitted evidence relating to similar offenses. There is no merit in either of these contentions.

The record reveals the following facts: In February 1959, the appellant lived with one Joe Potter, in apartment Number 3 at 1223-34th Street in Oakland. The complaining…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. SuticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. DerwaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. People v. FreytasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API