State v. Brown
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis of violating the wineroom ordinance of that city. The case was tried before Waite, J., who found defendant guilty and imposed a fine of $25 or imprisonment in the city workhouse not exceeding thirty days. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
START, C. 3.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, denying his motion for a new trial after his conviction of a violation of the wineroom ordinance of the city. The contention of the defendant is to the effect that the evidence is not sufficient to justify his conviction.
*176The record discloses evidence tending to show the facts following: On the day named in the complaint the defendant was conducting a licensed saloon for the sale of intoxicating liquors on the first floor of the premises known as No. 110 Third Street South, Minneapolis, which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BargeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State ex rel. Berry v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State v. McGregorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902