Legal Opinion

Freistat v. Industrial Bank of Commerce

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 24, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

It was not disputed that the defendant bank certified the checks through a mistake by one of its tellers. The record discloses, however, that the plaintiff payee of the checks has not been damaged by the certifications, nor has she changed her position in reliance thereon. In the circumstances the defendant is absolved from liability upon the checks (Carnegie Trust Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 213 N. Y. 301; Wachtel v. Rosen, 249 N. Y. 386; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Bank of United States, 259 N. Y. 365; Baldinger & Kupferman Mfg. Co. v. Manufacturers-Citizens Trust Co., 93 Misc. 94; Smith v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carnegie Trust Co. v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Howell v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Irving Bank of New York v. WetheraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Smith v. TreuthartNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Bank of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Plantations Bank of Rhode Island v. DESROMIERSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  2. International Press Clipping Bureau, Inc. v. American Trust Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API