Legal Opinion

Petty v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 8, 1932No. 15224Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

The contention of appellant in his motion for rehearing is that we erred in following the case of McGee v. State, 112 Texas Crim. Rep., 450, 17 S. W. (2d) 50, in which case the exact point here raised was by a majority opinion decided adversely to appellant. That case has been followed in Stapler v. State, 120 Texas Crim. Rep., 263, 47 S. W. (2d) 837. The views of the present writer as set out in a dissenting opinion in McGee’s case remain unchanged; likewise the views of the majority of the court remain the same as expressed in that case and in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Stapler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API