Legal Opinion

Lowe v. City of Hot Springs

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2015No. 27077PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The City of Hot Springs (the City) requested proposals from private entities interested in using real property that belonged to- the City. Pete Lien & Sons, Inc. (Lien) and Croell Redi-Mix (Croell) both submitted proposals to lease the property on various terms and conditions. Lien’s proposal was accepted, and a final agreement was negotiated. Croell subsequently sued to require the City to reject all proposals and restart the process. Croell contended that the City failed to adhere to the statutory requirements that municipalities must follow in contracting for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brandt v. County of PenningtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Jacobson v. LeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Tolle v. LevSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Johnson v. SellersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. Gtech Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mira Consulting, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Mira Consulting, Inc. v. Board of Educ.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API