Legal Opinion
People v. Barraza
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 8, 2013No. Supreme Court Case No. 12SA284PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
En Banc
2Opinion of the Court · HobbsJustice Hobbs
¶ 1 The prosecution brought this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 challenging the Adams County District Court’s order suppressing Carlos Barraza’s incriminating statements made prior to his first police interview at his home and his second interview at the police station after a Miranda advisement.1 Barraza was charged with retaliation against a witness or victim, a felony, when he confronted residents of an apartment who had called the police on his friend, leading to his friend’s arrest for trespass on a vehicle. The district court concluded that Barraza’s *924initial…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. PolanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- People v. BegaySupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- v. WakefieldColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. JaquezColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- v. AlemayehuColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Marcus PEREZ, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.