Legal Opinion

Chatfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 26, 2002No. 1D00-4568PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On this direct appeal following resen-tencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), appellant argues that his primary offense of sexual battery on a child age twelve or older but less than eighteen by a familial custodian in violation of section 794.011(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), should have been scored as a Level 7, rather than a Level 9, offense. He alleges, further, that the error resulted in an improper departure sentence without written reasons. The state concedes that the outcome of this appeal is controlled by our recent decision in Holt v. State, 808 So.2d 290…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Holt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartney v. PIEDMONT TECHNOLOGY, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Willis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API