Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stuart v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1988No. CA A45793; SC S34666PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceGillette, J.

This is a prison discipline case. Petitioner, an inmate at the Oregon State Penitentiary, was ordered by a correctional officer to provide a urine sample. He refused. He then was charged with misconduct for disobeying an order. A prison hearings officer found petitioner guilty of the charged misconduct. The hearings officer recommended a seven-day period of segregation and that petitioner “pay a $25.00 fine to the Department of Corrections for said major misconduct.” That recommendation was put into effect by an order of Fred Maass, the superintendent of the Penitentiary.

Petitioner sought…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Watson v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API