Legal Opinion

Wood v. Superintendent Caroline Correctional Unit

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 20, 1973No. Civ. A. 615-72-RPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, District Judge.

This habeas corpus action presents, inter alia, the important question of whether the rule enunciated in Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972), applies to cases in which an indigent misdemeanant, convicted without benefit of counsel, was fined and not sentenced.

Don Wood, a Virginia prisoner, brings this habeas corpus action pro se pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 1 Petitioner is currently detained pursuant to a third conviction before the Corporation Court of the City of Lynchburg of November 6, 1969, for petty larceny.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Russell SawayaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  2. Carey v. Zayre of Beverly Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. BarrettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Mays v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1973
  5. City of New Orleans v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API