Legal Opinion

Conner v. First National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1921No. 15966PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Brawley, J., entered March 23, 1920, in favor of the defendant, in an action to recover a fraudulent preference by an insolvent, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Nooksack Lumber- Company, seeks recovery from the defendant hank, proceeding upon the theory that it wrongfully obtained preference payments as a creditor of the lumber company while that company was insolvent. A trial upon the merits by the court sitting without a jury resulted in judgment denying to the plaintiff any recovery. He has appealed therefrom to this court.

The controlling facts, as we view them, are not in dispute. Indeed, we gather them almost wholly from *663the statement of them made by appellant’s own counsel. They may be summarized…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Puget Sound State Bank v. Washington Paving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A., De C v. V. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Allied Sheet Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Hudson United Bank v. House of Supreme, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Woods v. Metropolitan National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Johnson v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API