Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that County Court erred in failing to dismiss the charge of tampering with physical evidence (see, Penal Law § 215.40 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, ev*866idence of an actual or prospective official proceeding was not necessary because such an official proceeding " 'could readily [have been] contemplated’ ” under the circumstances (People v DeRue, 179 AD2d 1027,1029). Additionally, there is no requirement that an official proceeding have commenced by the time of trial (see, Penal Law § 215.40).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. DeRueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. KylerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. EscobarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. People v. HafeezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. MercedesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003
  4. People v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API