People v. Johnson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that County Court erred in failing to dismiss the charge of tampering with physical evidence (see, Penal Law § 215.40 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, ev*866idence of an actual or prospective official proceeding was not necessary because such an official proceeding " 'could readily [have been] contemplated’ ” under the circumstances (People v DeRue, 179 AD2d 1027,1029). Additionally, there is no requirement that an official proceeding have commenced by the time of trial (see, Penal Law § 215.40).…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. DeRueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. KylerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. EscobarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. HafeezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. MercedesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003
- People v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002