Legal Opinion
Hunt v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 14, 2009No. Case CV 06-04691 DDP (SSx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment filed on October 27, 2008]
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
This case is another in the line of cases challenging, on First Amendment grounds, ordinances regulating vending on the Venice Beach Boardwalk. Asserting an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiffs seek damages for First Amendment violations of three now-inactive Los Angeles City Ordinances: LAMC § 42.15 (2004), LAMC § 42.15 (2006), and…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hunt v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Dowd v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- People v. LarsenCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010
- Bandler v. Town of WoodstockDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019