Legal Opinion

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 8, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered April 9, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. (Akin Gump) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it as barred by collateral estoppel, judicial estoppel, and res judicata, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although in a prior diversity action, the Western District of Texas, adopting the recommendations of a Magistrate Judge, determined that Texas law governed, and required the dismissal of two contribution claims asserted against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Valero Energy Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Morris v. Landoll Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API