Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 23, 1988No. 87-1337PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

On his appeal from convictions of armed robbery and assault with intent to rob, the defendant asserts that the trial judge erred: (1) in permitting the prosecutor to question a defense witness, for the purpose of establishing bias against the government, about criminal charges pending against the witness; and, (2) in excluding a prior inconsistent statement by a victim witness about the name of the man who had robbed her. We affirm.

These, in outline, are the facts the jury could have found. At about 4 a.m. on February 22, 1986, Harriet Hartfield, with Lydia Wharton and Darryl Rowell as…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Virgil D. Dardi, Robert B. Gravis, Charles Rosenthal and Charles BermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. MahdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DixonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. FazzinoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. GrahamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. AllenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API