Legal Opinion

People v. Forsythe

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 14, 1980No. 79-405PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

The defendant, facing trial on a seven-count controlled substances indictment, served a discovery request on the State asking for the name of any informants involved in the case or, alternatively, that the informants be brought forward in an in-camera proceeding to confirm their existence. As a sanction for refusing to comply with discovery, the trial court dismissed all seven counts of the indictment. We hold that under the facts of this case the sanction was too severe, and we remand the cause for trial after the imposition of an appropriate sanction.

Charged with delivery of preludin and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. People v. LawsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. RaessAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. People v. HeinzmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. SuttonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. People v. WoodsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API