Legal Opinion

Cooper Agency, Inc. v. Harold M. McLeod District Director of Internal Revenue and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1965No. 9871PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs seek to test their tax liabilities in an action for an injunction and for removal of the cloud cast upon their properties by the tax liens. The judgment of the District Court dismissing these complaints is affirmed for the reasons stated by the District Judge 1

We recently considered similar contentions and held them unavailing. 2 At about the same time the Second and Third Circuits arrived at the same conclusion. 3

Affirmed.

1. 235 F.Supp. 276.

2. Broadwell v. United States, 4 Cir., 343 F.2d 470.

3. Falik v. United States, 2 Cir., 343 F.2d 38; Quinn v. Hook, 3 Cir., 341 F.2d 920.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rena Falik v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Cooper Agency, Inc. v. McLeodDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964
  3. Broadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  4. George T. Quinn, of the Estate of Thomas J. Thompson, Deceased v. Kenneth O. Hook, District Director of Internal Revenue and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eugene Cole and Mary Cole, His Wife v. Thomas A. Cardoza, District Director, United States, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  2. Carol Smith Shannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Fred Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  4. Shaw v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1970
  5. Nehf v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API