Legal Opinion

Vosberg v. Michigan Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1907No. 6461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered June 19, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee in a sawmill.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent was employed by the appellant to work as oiler and engineer in its sawmill at Aber*672deen. A part of Ms duty was to oil a certain gang edger, then in operation in the mill, which was connected with the main shaft by friction wheels in such manner as to enable it to be started and stopped without interfering with the operation of the principal machinery. The edger had bearings which could not be reached by the oiler with safety while it was in motion, and it was customary to stop it before proceeding to oil it. On November 1, 1905, the respondent, in the performance of his duty,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erickson v. E. J. McNeeley & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Johnston v. Northern Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Shaw Show Case Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Noelle v. Hoquiam Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Young v. Aloha Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Adams v. Peterman Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Burns v. LeudinghausWashington Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API