Cabezas v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MEYERS, Judge.
Appellant plead nolo contendere to the offense of Delivery of Cocaine weighing at least 400 grams. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(d)(3). The trial court found that in its opinion the best interest of society and the appellant would be served by deferring appellant’s adjudication of guilt. Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 42.12 § 5. However, the court was persuaded by the State that deferred adjudication probation was not an available alternative disposition, and therefore, found appellant guilty as charged and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Cabezas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
3Cited by23 opinions
- Derek Maurice Roots v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Riley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- Anthony Austin Metts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.