Legal Opinion

Cabezas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1993No. 906-92PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MEYERS, Judge.

Appellant plead nolo contendere to the offense of Delivery of Cocaine weighing at least 400 grams. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(d)(3). The trial court found that in its opinion the best interest of society and the appellant would be served by deferring appellant’s adjudication of guilt. Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 42.12 § 5. However, the court was persuaded by the State that deferred adjudication probation was not an available alternative disposition, and therefore, found appellant guilty as charged and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Cabezas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Derek Maurice Roots v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  2. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Riley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  5. Anthony Austin Metts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API