Legal Opinion

Home Brewing Co. v. Thomas Colliery Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1922No. Appeal, No. 64PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The facts involved in the present appeal are simple; the only conflict in the evidence appears from the testimony of the experts as to what might possibly happen to the surface of plaintiff’s lots from future mining under conditions as they now are or may be developed. The record is quite voluminous.

Sometime prior to 1900 the Stephen Girard estate leased to the Thomas Coal Company coal lands situated north of Line Street, Shenandoah, and that company mined the property. Plaintiff, in that year, became the owner of several lots of ground south of the land of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. DunbarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. McGettigan v. PottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Huckenstine's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  4. Youghiogheny River Coal Co. v. Allegheny National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Matulys v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shenandoah Borough v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Summit Hotel Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Pollock v. Pittsburgh, Bessemer & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Canfield Rubber Co. v. LearySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  5. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. SalardinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API