Legal Opinion

Burton, Exr. v. Tax Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1930No. 3573PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

It is the contention of the Tax Commission in view of these facts which are undisputed that the gifts were made by the donor in contemplation- of death within the meaning of 5331, 5332, and 5332-2, GC.

Sec 5331 GC of Ohio, as fixed by syllabus 3 in the case of Tax Commission v. Parker, et al, 117 Oh St, 215, is:

“Contemplation of death means that expectation of death which actuates the mind of a person on the- execution of his will.”

The burden of proof under these sections rested upon the plaintiffs in error to show that the gifts were not made in contemplation of death, the Tax Commission…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huntington National Bank v. Tax CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. In Re Estate of ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Dornbusch v. DornbuschOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Department of Taxation v. TolbertOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API