Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kleinman v. Bal Harbour Towers, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 1966No. 65-76Published

1DissentBarkdull, Judge

I concur with the views expressed by the majority, with the exception of that portion which holds that American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, was not a proper party to the lien foreclosure proceedings.

The law should not be ridiculous. When the mechanic’s lien was filed, the lienor had a right to seek redress in a court of chancery if he elected and, if successful, to secure a decree directing the amount of the payment of the indebtedness due him; and, in default of same, to have the property improved sold to satisfy the amount. When the property owner elected to transfer the lien…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. West Plumbing & Heating Co. v. HurleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Crane Co. v. Bradford Builders, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Rader & Associates v. Seward Dredging Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API