Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Cusimano

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 26, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The present motion in a pending probate proceeding seeks to compel three contestants, who were cited therein, and are statutory distributees and admittedly residents of Louisiana, to deposit security for costs. The moving affidavit states that they had little or no contact with the decedent for the past twenty years, that the objections have no basis in fact and are designated solely to harass the petitioners and to delay the proceedings in the hope of some sort of a settlement. All of the allegations of the objections are stated to be on information and belief.

The replying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Rosenberg v. . SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. In re the Estate of SeppalaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. Rosenberg v. CourtneyNew York City Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GinsburgNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982
  2. In re the Estate of RothwachsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
  3. In re TrippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  4. In re the Estate of FlynnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of KoelschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API