Legal Opinion

People v. Rutledge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*405In this prosecution for the knifepoint robbery and assault of a woman in the elevator of the building where she worked, it was reversible error for the prosecutor in summation to tell the jury that as "sophisticated New Yorkers, you know there’s an appeal process * * * to safeguard that defendant’s rights * * * So a verdict of guilty is not final and you need not agonize in this case there is nothing to agonize over”. This statement was interrupted twice by defense objections which were overruled by the court.

The People concede that the trial prosecutor’s comment was improper because it could…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. People v. SherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. People v. . EspositoNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. People v. SantiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Shaheed WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. SugdenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  3. United States v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API