Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martinez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1987No. 545-85, 546-85Published

1DissentClinton, Judge

As Judge Dally demonstrated in Shipman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 182 (Tex.Cr.App. 1980), almost one hundred years of precedent supports the rules there followed, viz:

“When a witness is cross-examined on a collateral matter, the cross-examining party may not then contradict the witness’ answer, [citations dating to 1889 omitted], A matter is collateral if the cross-examining party would not be entitled to prove that matter as a part of his case tending to establish his plea, [citations dating to 1883 omitted].”

Id., at 183-184.1 It is not that “by clever maneuvering” the prosecutor “procured the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Shipman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Ex Parte CarterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Mauldin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Grigsby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API