Mazza v. Manzella
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*610The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting proof that the infant plaintiff, who was riding a motorized bicycle, exited a driveway and collided into the defendant’s motor vehicle in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1143 and 1173 (see Yasinosky v Lenio, 28 AD3d 652, 653 [2006]; Lallemand v Cook, 23 AD3d 533 [2005]; Trzepacz v Jara, 11 AD3d 531 [2004]; Ferrara v Castro, 283 AD2d 392 [2001]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The fact that the infant plaintiff did not see the defendant’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bolta v. LohanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Ferrara v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Lupowitz v. FogartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- McNamara v. FishkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Meliarenne v. PriscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Desio v. Cerebral Palsy Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Garza v. TaravellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Boodlall v. HerreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Fried v. MisserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Huai Qiang Ye v. YepesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.